Krott v. New Directions — Utilization Manager Settlement

Case at a glance

Part of our utilization review cases →

New Directions utilization managers settle for $290,000

New Directions Behavioral Health provides benefit determinations for health plans. Its Utilization Managers, as the court’s order describes them, "review[] health insurance benefit requests against predetermined guidelines and criteria for insurance and payment purposes."1 New Directions paid them a salary and classified them as exempt. Plaintiff Maria Krott alleged that she worked more than 40 hours in a week and was owed overtime. New Directions denied that she was owed overtime.1

On September 10, 2020, the court conditionally certified a collective of salaried Utilization Managers. On January 13, 2022, Judge Greg Kays approved a $290,000 settlement covering 32 people.1

Read about the certification ruling →

The legal issue

The administrative exemption covers employees whose primary duty includes "the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance." 29 C.F.R. § 541.200(a)(3). Checking a request against criteria someone else wrote is not that. Whatever the job title, if the work is applying the insurer’s guidelines, the administrative exemption should not apply.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much was the New Directions settlement?

$290,000, approved by the court on January 13, 2022. It covered 32 people.

What did the workers claim?

That New Directions classified its Utilization Managers as exempt even though they reviewed benefit requests against predetermined guidelines and criteria.

Are behavioral health utilization managers entitled to overtime?

Often, yes. Reviewers who apply set guidelines rather than exercising independent judgment may not meet the administrative exemption.

Did you do this job somewhere else? Tell us about it.

If you did this kind of work for another employer and weren't paid overtime for hours over 40, tell us your job title, your employer and the state you worked in. We'll tell you plainly whether we think you have a case. Federal law makes it illegal to retaliate against you for asking.

Tell us about it →

About Siegel Law Group

Siegel Law Group PLLC concentrates in unpaid overtime cases under the FLSA and state wage laws. The firm has filed more than 100 federal overtime cases, obtained more than 50 class and collective certifications, and recovered more than $100 million for workers. Free consultation. Contingency fee: we advance case costs, and they are repaid from any recovery. No recovery, no fee and no costs. Phone: (214) 790-4454 | Email: [email protected]

These are results in other people's cases. Every case depends on its own facts and law. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website contains attorney advertising.

Attorney responsible: Jack L. Siegel, Siegel Law Group PLLC, 11341 W. US Hwy 290, Bldg. 2, Austin, TX 78737. Licensed in Texas.

Notes

  1. Krott v. New Directions Behavioral Health, L.L.C., No. 4:19-cv-00915, Doc. 61 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 13, 2022) (order approving FLSA settlement: "gross settlement amount of $290,000"; class of 32 individuals; conditional certification granted Sept. 10, 2020, ECF No. 30).
$100M+
Recovered for Workers
100+
Federal Overtime Cases
50+
Class & Collective Certifications
27
Federal Courts

Think You're Owed Overtime?

Every consultation is free and confidential. We take overtime cases on contingency: we advance the costs of the case, those costs are repaid out of any recovery, and if we do not recover you owe us nothing — no attorney’s fee and no costs.

How Long Do You Have to File?

Select your state to see your overtime claim deadline.

Deadlines shown are general guidelines based on federal and state law. Some exceptions may extend or shorten these periods. This is not legal advice. Contact an attorney for your specific situation.