Holding Corporate Giants Accountable.

Federal overtime settlements recovered by Siegel Law Group. $100M+ recovered for workers nationwide across 100+ federal cases.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts.

Pruess v. Presbyterian Health Plan — $38.7M Overtime Settlement

$38.7 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico

Deakin v. Magellan Health — $16M Overtime Settlement

$16 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico

Key v. Butch's Rat Hole — 160 Oilfield Workers Paid

Confidential Settlement (Filed Under Seal) Settlement

U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico

Burruss v. Wyoming Casing — $2.71M Oilfield Deal

$2.71 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota

Candelaria v. HCSC Blue Cross — Settlement Approved

Confidential (Filed Under Seal) Settlement

U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico

Brewer v. Molina — $3.375M Case Manager Settlement

~$3.375 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Loomis v. Unum — $14.8M Overtime Settlement

~14.8 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Del Toro v. Centene — $3.45M Overtime Settlement

~$3.45 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri

Woods v. CVS Caremark — $16.67M Overtime Settlement

$16,669,155.84 Final Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri

Snider v. Quantum Health — $1.3M UR Settlement

~$1.3 Million Settlement Settlement

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Slaughter v. Caidan — $3.25M Overtime Settlement

$3,250,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan

Drake v. Tufts — Utilization Review Overtime Deal

$85,614.99 Settlement

U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts

Heckle v. Matrix Absence — $4.25M Overtime Settlement

$4,250,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

Kelly v. Evolent Health — $415K Overtime Settlement

~$415,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Krott v. New Directions — 91% Recovery for UR Staff

~$290,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida

Green v. Reliance Standard — $930K Claims Deal

$930,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Brunty v. Optima/Sentara — $868K Settlement

$868,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Gongora-Ownby v. Molina — $3.38M Case Manager Deal

~$3,380,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas

Ford v. Cardinal Innovations — $300K Settlement

$300,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Bellan v. Capital BlueCross — $400K UR Settlement

$400,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Barbee v. NaviHealth — $4.69M Overtime Settlement

~$4,690,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee

Solis v. OrthoNet — $3M Care Manager Settlement

$3,000,000 Settlement

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Russell v. eQHealth — $700K Overtime Settlement

No. 3:19-cv-00005-SDD-EWD

Paycheck Red Flag Checker

Check every statement that applies to you.

I regularly work more than 40 hours per week but don't receive overtime pay
My employer classifies me as "salaried" but controls my daily schedule and hours
I perform the same tasks as hourly coworkers who do receive overtime
I work off the clock — before shifts, after shifts, or through lunch breaks
My employer docks my pay when I miss part of a day (e.g., doctor's appointment)
I was recently reclassified from hourly to salary with no change in duties
My job title sounds managerial, but I don't actually manage anyone
I'm required to be "on call" or respond to messages outside work hours without extra pay

Your risk level

Check the boxes above to see your risk assessment.

Talk to an Overtime Attorney — Free

For informational purposes only. Each situation is unique and depends on specific facts and applicable law. This is not legal advice.