The Siegel Law Group achieved what is believed to be the first-ever class certification under the New Mexico Minimum Wage Act (NMMWA) in federal court in this landmark Peak Pressure Control overtime lawsuit. In Rodriguez v. Peak Pressure Control, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00576-JCH-JFR (D.N.M.), the court certified a class of approximately 150 Pressure Control Operators denied overtime pay while working grueling schedules in New Mexico's oilfields. The firm has recovered $100M+ for workers nationwide and concentrates in challenging overtime violations in the oil and gas industry.
On June 4, 2020, Senior Judge Judith C. Herrera issued two rulings. First, the court granted Rule 23(b)(3) class certification under the NMMWA — a milestone that had never been achieved in federal court under New Mexico's overtime statute. Judge Herrera found that Peak Pressure Control's uniform exemption policy was "probative of the existence of common answers to common questions." The court appointed Jack Siegel as class counsel.
Second, and equally significant, the court granted partial summary judgment striking down the defendants' administrative exemption defense under the NMMWA. Judge Herrera applied the administrative-production dichotomy from Dewan v. M-I, L.L.C. (5th Cir. 2017) and found that PCOs' primary duties were undisputedly manual — operating hand pumps and knobs to maintain wellbore pressure, rigging up and down equipment, and monitoring wellheads in the field. The court held that "a reasonable trier of fact could not conclude that PCOs were responsible for running the business affairs" of the defendants. The court also rejected the defendants' arguments that PCOs performed "quality control," "marketing," or "safety and health" administrative functions — finding these were merely incidents of producing the services the company sells.
In a separate ruling within the same opinion, the court confirmed that the NMMWA applies to out-of-state employers for work performed in New Mexico — an important holding for oilfield workers employed by Texas-based companies operating in New Mexico's Permian Basin.
This ruling established that the NMMWA's overtime protections can be enforced through a federal class action — a tool that had never been used under that statute. It demonstrated that New Mexico state overtime laws provide protections beyond the FLSA, and that workers can pursue claims under both federal and state laws simultaneously. For the oilfield industry, this case put employers on notice: uniform policies that misclassify field workers as exempt from overtime will face class-wide scrutiny.
Approximately 150 PCOs worked 12-hour days, totaling 84 or more hours per week, for Peak Pressure Control and Nine Energy Services in New Mexico's oilfields. Despite these punishing schedules, their employer paid them on a salary or salary-plus-bonus basis with no overtime. The defendants claimed the executive and administrative exemptions applied.
The court rejected the administrative exemption defense at summary judgment because the PCOs spent their days performing physically demanding, manual labor — operating pressure control equipment, monitoring wellheads, and working in the field. Their primary duties had nothing to do with management or office-level decision-making. Nine Energy Services had been the subject of 16 prior FLSA lawsuits, underscoring the systemic nature of the company's pay practices.
The firm also secured certifications and rulings in the related Snively v. Peak Pressure Control litigation, including denial of decertification and approval of representative trial evidence.
If you worked in New Mexico's oilfields and were paid a salary without overtime — or if you believe your employer misclassified you as exempt — you may have a claim under the NMMWA, the FLSA, or both. The NMMWA permits Rule 23 class actions (opt-out), meaning all affected workers are automatically included unless they choose to exclude themselves — a significant advantage over FLSA collective actions, which require workers to affirmatively opt in.
The New Mexico Minimum Wage Act (NMMWA) is a state overtime law that requires employers to pay overtime for hours worked over 40 per week. Unlike the FLSA, the NMMWA can be enforced through a Rule 23 class action in federal court, which automatically includes all affected workers unless they opt out.
It is believed to be the first-ever class certification under the NMMWA in federal court. This established a new legal pathway for New Mexico workers to challenge employer pay practices through a federal class action under state law.
Oilfield workers who perform primarily physical, manual labor in the field typically do not qualify for the administrative or executive exemptions. These exemptions are designed for office and management workers, not field hands operating equipment and working wellheads.
In a class action (Rule 23), all affected workers are automatically included unless they opt out. In a collective action (FLSA), workers must affirmatively opt in by filing a consent form. Class actions typically result in larger groups and greater employer accountability.
After class certification, notice is sent to all class members. The case then proceeds through discovery, potential summary judgment motions, and trial. Because all class members are automatically included, the scope of potential liability is typically larger than in a collective action.
Yes. Workers in New Mexico can pursue claims under both the FLSA and the NMMWA simultaneously. Each statute may provide different protections, exemption standards, and damages calculations. Pursuing both maximizes the worker's potential recovery.
The Siegel Law Group is a national overtime and wage law firm devoted entirely to representing workers denied overtime pay. Where many firms include wage cases as a small part of a broader employment practice, the Siegel Law Group has built its entire practice around overtime litigation — and the results reflect that commitment: $100M+ recovered for workers, 50+ class and collective action certifications, and 100+ federal lawsuits filed in 27+ federal courts nationwide. Founding attorney Jack Siegel is a Bloomberg BNA contributing author on wage and hour law.
Free consultation. Contingency fee — no fee unless we win.
Phone: (214) 790-4454 | Email: [email protected]
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This website contains attorney advertising.
Search by company or industry to see overtime case activity.
Case information shown is from public court filings and approved settlements. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
