On July 27, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico entered a stipulated order conditionally certifying an FLSA collective of salaried field personnel in Deschamps v. Nova Hardbanding, LLC, Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-00493-GBW-SMV. In this Nova Hardbanding oilfield overtime lawsuit, the parties agreed to conditional certification, and the court approved notice by mail, email, and text message. Jack Siegel, with co-counsel, represented the workers.
A United States Magistrate Judge signed the Stipulation and Order Regarding Notice to Potential Plaintiffs (Doc. 13). Under it, the parties agreed that the court’s signature would conditionally certify the case as an FLSA collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).
In close paraphrase, the group included field personnel employed by the defendants over the previous three years who were paid a salary or salary plus bonus and whose primary duties involved technical or manual labor at job sites. A footnote listed drill pipe inspectors, hardbanders, hardbander operators, inspection helpers, inspectors, inspector helpers, and other job titles with similar duties.
The defendants had seven days to produce contact information. If they were late, the statute of limitations would be tolled for each day after the seventh day. Notice could go by first class mail, overnight delivery, or electronically, including a short text message and email whose wording the order set out, each with a link to the notice and consent form. Workers had forty-five (45) days from the first mailing to file a consent form.
This was an agreed order. It states: “Despite this stipulation, Defendants continue to deny that they have violated the FLSA in any respect.” The court-approved notice also said the court took no position on the merits. Still, because the group turned on pay and duties rather than one title, a hardbander and an inspector helper could both receive notice.
According to the court-approved notice attached to the order, the lawsuit claimed that Nova misclassified field personnel as exempt from overtime, paid them on a salary basis, and failed to pay overtime for hours over forty. Nova denied those claims, and the order did not decide them.
As general information, a salary alone does not make a hardbander or pipe inspector exempt, and under 29 C.F.R. § 541.3(a) the white-collar exemptions do not apply to manual laborers or other blue-collar workers. The administrative exemption, for example, requires pay on a salary basis at or above a set minimum and a primary duty of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or its customers. That primary duty must also include the exercise of discretion and independent judgment on matters of significance. Learn more about salaried vs. hourly pay and overtime.
In 2017, many federal courts used a lenient two-step approach to conditional certification. Some federal appeals courts have since changed this approach — the Fifth Circuit in Swales v. KLLM Transport Services (2021) and the Sixth Circuit in Clark v. A&L Homecare & Training Center (2023).
This page describes a 2017 court order. The time to join that collective was set by the court in that case. If you have worked in a similar role, the Siegel Law Group can evaluate your own claims.
Were you a salaried hardbander, drill pipe inspector, or inspector helper doing hands-on work at job sites? Contact the Siegel Law Group for a free consultation.
Related rulings: Rodriguez v. Peak Pressure Control, another District of New Mexico oilfield overtime case for salaried field workers, Weaks v. Nova Mud, another 2017 District of New Mexico stipulated order for salaried field personnel, and Olivas v. C & S Oilfield Services, another District of New Mexico case for salaried field personnel.
Often they do. A hardbander or drill pipe inspector who spends the day on hands-on technical or manual work usually does not fit a white-collar exemption, even with a salary. Federal rules exclude blue-collar workers from those exemptions. The answer depends on your actual duties, not your title or your pay stub.
No, not by itself. Pay is only one part of the test, and an exemption also requires that the worker’s main duties fit a specific category, such as executive, administrative, or professional work. A field employee earning a salary plus a bonus for manual job-site work can still be owed time and a half for hours past forty.
The court allowed it. In the Nova Hardbanding case, the order set the exact words of a short text and email, and each message carried a link to electronic copies of the notice and consent form. Not every court approves text notice, and consent rules vary by case.
The 2017 order reached field personnel the defendants had employed during the three prior years, if they were paid a salary or salary plus bonus and their primary duties involved technical or manual labor at job sites. A footnote named drill pipe inspectors, hardbanders, hardbander operators, and inspector helpers, among others. The court in that case set its own time to join.
The Siegel Law Group is a national overtime and wage law firm devoted entirely to representing workers denied overtime pay. Where many firms include wage cases as a small part of a broader employment practice, the Siegel Law Group has built its entire practice around overtime litigation — and the results reflect that commitment: $100M+ recovered for workers, 50+ class and collective action certifications, and 100+ federal lawsuits filed in 27+ federal courts nationwide. Founding attorney Jack Siegel is a Bloomberg BNA contributing author on wage and hour law.
Free consultation. Contingency fee — no fee unless we win.
Phone: (214) 790-4454 | Email: [email protected]
This website contains attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Search by company or industry to see overtime case activity.
Case information shown is from public court filings and approved settlements. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
